« March 2005 | Main | May 2005 »

KM and Learning

Is KM linked with  your learning strategy?

The purpose of training and development in organisations is to enhance performance - initially of individuals but ultimately of the organisation itself. There is currently much debate within the HR community on the ROI of training and substantial efforts are being made to link spending on training with improvements in performance (if I send my staff on a project management course will they be able to complete projects more quickly and therefore improve the overall performance of the organisation). But is training the best way to improve people’s performance? Probably not, at least not by attending formal training courses. People’s performance improves due to a rich mix of learning interactions – not least of which is the ability of people to learn from each other – or putting it another way to share knowledge about how to improve the way things are done. In this context there is a direct link between knowledge sharing and learning. A recent study by CapitalWorks (a US  human capital consultancy) surveyed hundreds of knowledge workers and asked them to attribute knowledge sources relative to knowledge actually required to do their jobs. 75% of the sources were informal, while only 25% were formal. Despite this 75% of the investments made in learning were on formal training programmes and only 25% on informal learning activities. The conclusion was that most organisations could dramatically improve the ROI on learning by shifting investments from formal to informal learning. What does informal learning look like – well it will probably look different in different organisations but explicitly linking knowledge and learning strategies is one sure way to begin to improve the performance of your people and your organisation. Knowledge management, learning management, performance management – they all point towards the same ultimate goal.

Knowledge Business e-Simulation

I assisted at a TangoNet session for the London Knowledge Network at the University of GreenwichBusiness School last week. The session was led by Graham Fernee (the UK TangoNet guru) and suppoted by Martyn Laycock and myself as a TangoNet coach. Once again TangoNet proved it's worth both as an effective learning tool and as a unique introduction to the issues that make knowledge businesses tick. Though it's PC based we run it as a fully facilitated session in a classroom environment with three people per team (nominally playing the roles of HR, S&M and CEO). Unlike the table top version of Tango TangoNet can be run happily over a single day and because each participant gets a version of the software to keep it can be used after the event for further exploration (I've been playing this week with a volume strategy since our team failed to implement one successfully). TangoNet really is engaging and if you work in a knowledge business (basically a business that relies for its success on knowledgeable people) you will find that the game mechanics simulate reality wonderfully. It's perfect for a consulting or business services organisations  - especially in the B2B sector. It can also be used successfully in the non-profit or public sector, or any organisation that has a business model that relies on matching quality teams with demanding clients. Indeed it gets its name from the phrase 'It takes two to Tango' - quality people in step with quality customers.   

My Photo

Recent Posts

Best Blogs

Recommended Reading

February 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29  

Subscribe