« December 2004 | Main | February 2005 »

Learning Technologies 2005, London,

Officeteam_3I managed to get to Learning Technologies this year – wanted to see what aspects of e-learning are currently being marketed to corporates. The exhibition was a little disappointing, especially in comparison with the much more lively BETT Show (see BETT entry). Strangely, it also attracts a completely different set of vendors. The only key companies to exhibit at both were Macromedia and the BBC.

It included the usual mix of enterprise systems (LMS, LCMS etc), authoring solutions, content developers and off-the-shelf providers. Nothing really new but I did hear the term ‘rapid e-learning development’ more than once – I guess primarily as a defence against the sometimes extended time that it can actually take to get a good bespoke e-learning course developed. Most of these rapid development tools though are simply variations on the Power Point theme – with the addition of self-test functionality. It’s hard to imagine that ‘anyone’ can produce engaging e-learning courses ‘at the touch of a button’ using these tools especially when you consider that most users’ PowerPoint skills are pretty poor. However, Macromedia’s Breeze product does integrate neatly with Power Point (Breeze gets it’s own menu within the application) and though not a fully featured learning content development tool it does allow basic e-courses to be put together relatively quickly.

I shall be trying Breeze out soon and hopefully using it both to support my own learning programs, and those of my clients. 

Not a lot else to report. Saba weren’t there. Blackboard was also missing. Docent merged last year with Click2Learn and are re-branded as SumTotal (www.sumtotalsystems.com). Tata Interactive were showing some neat bespoke induction programmes developed for Orange, Vodafone and also NTL. I asked them about the development costs of such programmes – between £15k and £20k per hour for the first hour - which is a fairly standard figure for the industry, but don’t forget that Tata send most of their development work to Mumbai. Bespoke development costs – even when you offshore it to India.

If you missed Learning Technologies then you didn’t miss much. Maybe HRD 2005 (www.cipd.co.uk/hrd) will be better for those of us interested in using technology to improve the way organisations train and develop their employees.

BETT Show, Olympia, 12-15 January 2005

The British Educational Technology and Trade (BETT) show is targeted at the education market and specifically the primary and secondary sector (5-18). This isn’t my normal client base but the show is useful because after substantial government investment the education sector is ahead of industry in innovative use of ICT to support learning.

There is an eclectic mix of companies and organisations exhibiting at the show. Centre stage are the government funded bodies themselves - the DfES, Teacher Training Agency, Becta (the Government agency for ICT in education) and the National Council for School Leadership (NCSL). Key players in ICT such as Apple and Microsoft were also there - Apple promoting it’s user friendly machines and software - Microsoft it’s office applications plus it’s Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) product Class Server. Macromedia was also there showing its creative development tools (including Dreamweaver and Flash) and also its Virtual Classroom product Breeze.

Interactive whiteboards are clearly big business in the education market with products from a variety of companies and accompanying software applications which make the most of the format’s advantages. I have used these interactive whiteboards at a number of venues and though they take a little getting used to, if used thoughtfully, they can really improve interaction in a presentation or workshop. Crucially, like most technologies, you have to try them to really understand how to get the most from them.

“Interactive whiteboards are the most common method of interacting with large visual displays, a key benefit being the ease of manipulation of texts and images. This kinaesthetic motion of dragging images and text into correct positions can assist in embedding learning and understanding of concepts and links to pedagogical approaches based upon visual, auditory and kinaesthetic approaches to learning.” www.nestafuturelab.org

Some highlights at BETT 2005:

Microsoft Class Server

Although late to market with their VLE product Class Server Microsoft appear to have developed a tool that nicely supports the conventional classroom based approach. Based on a range of existing Microsoft technologies (including SharePoint and IIS) Class Server provides an integrated schools portal aimed at teachers, students and parents. Though it’s targeted at the education market I can also see it having potential within a corporate learning environment or as an added value service from a dedicated training provider.

Virtual Classrooms
Virtual classrooms are going to grow in popularity as pressure grows to train people more quickly and more cheaply. One of the most polished is Macromedia’s Breeze which combines video, VOIP, IM and presentation facilities to provide a virtual learning experience that is the next best thing to actually being in a classroom together. None of the individual elements of Breeze are new but the way it combines them and runs on Flash technology within a standard web browser makes it a product that has enormous potential.

NESTA Futurelab
“NESTA Futurelab is helping to transform the way people learn. We're using new and emerging technologies to create rich learning resources that are involving, interactive and imaginative.”

NESTA Futurelab is an initiative of NESTA (the National Endowment for Science Technology and the Arts) and is funded from National Lottery cash. They fund projects which break new ground in using technology to support learning. If you think e-learning or virtual classrooms were cutting edge check out their upcoming workshop on ‘artificial emotion technology’.

ExLink: www.nestafuturelab.org
ExLink: Microsoft Class Server
ExLink: Macromedia Breeze


Choose and Book

One of the largest ICT projects ever funded by the UK government is attempting to revolutionise the way patients and healthcare professionals keep tabs on each other. The project is centred around an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) System but includes a number of discrete functional parts. One of these, 'Choose and Book' is designed to allow General Practitioners (at the coalface of routine healthcare) to choose which hospital and medical team they refer their patients to. Currently there are 9.4m such referrals each year, representing about half of most hospital's workload. That's a lot of booking and a not inconsiderable amount of choosing to do! More than 200,000 'choosings and bookings' should have been made by the end of last year but only 63 were actually made according to the National Audit Office.

Apart from the usual technical problems and some issues over patient confidentiality there appears to be serious issues with the 'process' that GPs need to follow to use the system. A GP interviewed on BBC1 this morning (19 Jan) said that it took nearly 45 minutes to go through the process on-screen - and even GPs with good ICT skills found the system hard work.

In my experience this is the key reason ICT systems fail - the user behaviour and process are never fully modelled. According to the BMA, GPs were involved in the design, but only very early on, and it appears that by the time they were able to really test the system out it was too late to make major changes to the underlying functionality. On so many projects I have seen a token involvement by so-called 'user representatives' count as fully fledged user-centred design. In my book this doesn't count - if you want to develop system that will actually be used you need to embed real users and user advocates (that's one of my roles) right from the start - and keep them with you right until the end.

I'm currently working on some outline ideas for a 'Technology Integration Model' (TIM) which can be used during technology projects to assess the balance of resources between PEOPLE, PROCESS and TECHNOLOGY. Codename is 'Tripod' - watch this space.

If you have experience in this area I'd love to hear from you. Possibly collaborate in some way?

Dragons Den Again

LebeanockTonight's entrepreneurs were a little more interesting/entertaining. Watch out for:

Le Beanock  - A sort of upmarket cross between a bean bag and a hammock (www.lebeanock.com)
3D Visualiser - A combination of laser measuring device and digital camera.

Both these products got the Dragon's backing - the first an investment of £54k for a 49% equity stake - the latter £50k for a 30% equity stake. 

It will be interesting to see how these and all the other Dragon's Den fledgling businesses do in the future - I'm sure the beeb have this in mind too - and we will see programmes in 2006 looking at how these companies are getting on. It will be interesting viewing. Investors place your bets. Now which would I choose?

CRM – Episode 1 - In which a new customer is treated uncaringly…

Customer Relationship Management (CRM) is proving to be a never ending source of interest for me given my current work focus. And by CRM I mean the systems that companies use to manage interactions with customers rather than the physical act of ‘having a relationship’ with a customer. The distinction is artificial but is the primary reason why so many companies are going to lose lots of customers because of a poor understanding of what it feels like as a customer to interact with a CRM system rather than a real company with real people.

In the true spirit of knowledge sharing let me tell you a story about my interactions as a customer of Savastore.com (Watford Electronics online division). In November I ordered one of the new multi-format dual layer DVD Writers from LG Electronics. As usual the online ordering process was completely painless and after one failed delivery attempt the new drive turned up looking not only business-like but also unusually pleasing aesthetically (the casing is white in the style of the latest Apple Macs). After carefully unpacking the box and finding a suitable location for the new drive I went to connect the various cables but quickly discovered that the unit had been supplied with a two pin European mains plug in place of the three pin UK plug. My planned back-up schedule would have to be put on hold – but worst of all I knew that I would instantly be re-categorised from ‘satisfied customer’ to potential ‘trouble maker’.

Where should I start? The web site has a returns policy but I couldn’t face trawling through all the small print and as with all these ‘legal’ documents the wording is very customer hostile. I decided to brave the dreaded telephone queue and call them. Finding the phone number though wasn’t easy – because of course being an e-commerce set-up they want you to use e-mail and patiently wait for a response within 48 hours. In practice of course it may not take them this long to respond to your ‘grumbling’ e-mail – but the potential 48 hour lag makes you feel quite disconnected – especially when you paid extra for express next day delivery.

Once I did find a number (which incidentally is an 0870 national rate number which doesn’t qualify as a free-call for most domestic phone lines with all-in-one tariffs) I got through the queue quite quickly. But then the CRM system kicked in with vengeance. “We can’t deal with returns by telephone. You must complete the ‘Returns Authorisation Procedure’ online.” So much for ‘customer service’ - felt more like the good old ‘customer complaints’ – at least you were prepared for battle then. The returns authorisation procedure requires logging-in (if you can remember your ID and password) and completing some forms which strangely are also pretty customer hostile. Why? Because as a ‘returner’ you are lumped in with the ‘time wasters’ that order stuff that they don’t really want or send stuff back after opening the packaging (not sure how many people genuinely fall into this category). There are also threats of extra charges being levied on your credit card if the reason you are sending stuff back is not deemed valid. Now I know that none of this applies to me – it’s actually Savastore’s fault that I have been expressly delivered the incorrect product but it still feels like you’re a troublemaker. The result of all that extra form filling is that I had been allocated a number and would have to wait for ‘returns authorisation’, which may be declined apparently. I still didn’t have any idea what the actual returns procedure was and whether I had to pay to have the item returned before a replacement could be sent. I just knew that the whole process would take ages and that no one at Savastore really appeared to care.

This is customer relationship management (small caps) at its very worst – and the sad fact is that it’s because of the CRM systems in place. Now there’s a paradox. In this case, CRM isn’t about improving the way you interact with your customers it’s about reducing the overhead on the customer transaction and minimising any expensive human contact with customers. CRM is a powerful tool but misuse it at your peril.

Now, a glimmer of hope surfaced during this epic tale when I actually managed to speak to a customer service person who straight away realised that the error was Savastore’s and committed to sending me the correct power cable. Suddenly a little human contact and empathy had defused the situation. So much so that I actually ordered a 17” panel from them as a late Christmas present for a family member. That’s how good customer service can turn things around.

Sadly though the tale doesn’t end there. When I finally got by LG DVD writer up and running it failed miserably to write to DVDs and only occasionally would write to a CD. I contacted Savastore Technical Support. I tried the phone but after being on hold for 20 minutes (on an 0870 number) as FIRST in the queue I realised that technical support was either one seriously overworked person or just a piece of CRM telecoms software that rotated callers around a virtual queue while Savastore made cash from the 0870 call tariff. A quick look on Savastore’s web site (18 Jan 2005) reveals that they are looking for a new Technical Support Advisor but at only £10-12k per annum they are unlikely to get anyone who can seriously support the breadth of products sold by the company.

I’m sure that in a perfect world Savastore would like you to go direct to the manufacturer for technical support issues – but sadly the link on their site pointing to a page listing contact details for all manufacturers is broken and results in a ‘page not found’ error.

Savastore aren’t alone in adopting this easy to buy, hard to complain approach. If you look at the small print of a number of online retailers you will find quite a few ‘no telephone contact’ policies. This has serious consequences for a number of reasons. Firstly, when a customer is angry or upset they need some empathy and that can only be given via synchronous communication. Asynchronous e-mail is fine for transactional stuff but try complaining via e-mail – it just doesn’t work so well – the response lag (in Savastore’s case up to 48 hours or more) makes the customer feel powerless. Additionally, there is no process for escalating a complaint. In a shop if a sales assistant fails to deal with your complaint properly you can ask to speak to their manager. Escalation is an important aspect of good customer service – it brings in a fresh person with a fresh viewpoint – and hopefully one with more knowledge and skills to deal with the customer’s issue.

This ‘negative’ approach to customer service flies in the face of all the evidence about how to build good customer relationships. Assuming that all ‘complaints’ must be an attack on the company and defended at all costs is an unsustainable policy for good long term business and only works in the short term when there are enough new customers attracted by low prices, good stock levels or quick delivery. The internet can be a fickle trading environment with customers able to move between supplier sites with the click of the back button but failing to deal effectively with what is hopefully a very small number of customers who genuinely have problems is a business practice that will ultimately prove disastrous.

A quick search for fellow sufferers revealed quite a few similar tales of uncaring service from other Savastore customers. Grumbletext has quite a few (see www.grumbletext.co.uk). These ‘consumer voice’ sites will begin to highlight companies that say one thing but do another and will be an increasingly powerful weapon in the battle for good customer service. Ironically, Savastore’s web site has a customer review facility like that pioneered by Amazon but there is little evidence of any ‘poor’ reviews. This is probably because customer reviews appear to be filtered by the company – I reviewed the LG DVD Writer and gave it only one star but the review has never appeared on the site. One wonders if the few reviews there are on the site are truly genuine – no audit trail exists and all are either 4 or 5 stars. One cheap and cheerful Aries LCD monitor has three reviews - all five star ratings from three separate people on the same day. Looks very suspicious to me. There is a link to review guidelines but this just opens a blank child window – a particularly ironic touch.

Savastore’s approach is a long way from the new customer driven paradigm set out by Patricia Seybold in ‘Customers.com’ or ‘The Customer Revolution’ and is at odds with their web site mission statement, ‘Renowned for service excellence’.

What’s particularly short sighted about this approach is that it will alienate a large amount of potential new customers – those that have never ordered anything online. Even for me – an internet expert – the attraction of buying online is losing its initial gloss and if I can buy something in PC World at a reasonable price (even if it’s a little more expensive) I will be tempted to do that rather than buy online. Why? Because if I am dissatisfied I can walk back into the store and complain to a human being – not to a CRM system.

I’ve learnt my lesson and actually it’s a variation on a lesson my dad taught me and that his dad taught him – ‘The day you buy is the day you may need to send something back’. Make sure that you buy from a company that lets you do this painlessly.

So much for cutting edge CRM.

Any CRM stories to share? Please leave a comment or mail me.

More Dragon's Den

Dragon's Den wasn't quite so interesting this week - primarily because the entrepreneurs had such poor business ideas. Some to keep an eye on:

StableTable  - a device to stop your table wobbling in a restaurant
Music Control - a web site that enables musicians to sell their work via downloads
Flower Quiver - packaging that enables you to carry flowers over your shoulder
Personal Air Vehicle - a plane that you keep on your driveway.

Only one entrepreneur got the cash she needed - missed the name - but she effectively ran a style consultancy for high powered women - you know, the ones that are too busy to go shopping (sounds like most 'men' to me). She, or one of her consultants, pitch up at the office, suck-up a lot and go away (hopefully) with an order for a £600 sharp business suit. She wanted £120,00 and was prepared to give away 20% equity. She got the cash but had to give up 40% equity - she also had to commit to cutting her proposed salary from £70k to £35k.

I hate this sort of 'premium' service business - the basic aim is to charge customers as much as possible to buy into an illusion - it's not unlike buying seats in First Class when flying to Paris - a complete waste of money unless you are suffering from 'status anxiety'. It won't work - customers are too well informed these days - give them quality not the illusion of quality.

If this programme represents the pinnacle of UK innovation - I'm going to get seriously depressed. Let's hope for better things next week.

Entering the Dragons Den

Umbrollymachine_1If you're interested in innovation, entrepreneurship or just running a business then a new series on BBC2 called ' Dragon's Den' is simply unmissable. The first episode was aired tonight (Tuesday 4th Jan) at 8pm and placed a variety of entrepreneurs in front of five investors - all very successful and very rich business owners themselves - and got them to 'pitch' their business idea. The entrepreneurs have to have a sound business plan and must request a specific amount of cash - there's no limit on how much they can ask for but the more they ask for the more convincing they have to be in persuading the 'dragons' to take the risk.

Only one entrepreneur was successful tonight - his umbrella vending business idea got an investment of £150,000 in exchange for a 40% equity stake (though he planned to give away only 20%). And that raises one of the most interesting facets of the programme - the amount of equity or ownership that entrepreneurs are prepared to trade in order to get their business off the ground. The partners of one other start-up showed a product that rocked babies to sleep while still in their pram - the 'dragons' were clearly interested but the failure of the partners to give away more than 5% equity meant that they lost any hope of a deal. Why wouldn't they give away more than 5%? Probably because they thought that since they had the original idea and had put in all the work so far it felt wrong to give away any more. But in practice the 'dragons' weren't just offering cash but also a whole stack of expertise, enthusiasm and commitment in helping get the business off to a flying start. An innovative product or business idea is the essence of intellectual capital, but the ability to take that idea to market successfully needs bags of know-how in other areas too. 60% of a successful business is clearly more desirable than 95% of a neat idea. Talent and capital dancing together. Don't forget to catch next week's episode - it's compelling viewing for all business people.

ExLink: Preview in the Guardian TV Guide

ExLink: A Short History of Umbrella Vending

My Photo

Recent Posts

Best Blogs

Recommended Reading

February 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29  

Subscribe